On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:21:08PM +0200, Kurt Pruenner wrote:
> So as far as my side is concerned I'd say this bug can probably be
> closed, even though we still don't know what happened exactly - it's as
> if dpkg was somehow unable to grok that /etc/vim/vimrc.tiny wasn't
> provided by the new vi
James Vega wrote:
> I don't see how your bug report could have happened given the above.
> vim-tiny's Conflicts (as well as the Depends on a specific version of
> vim-common) should have caused the old vim-common to be removed before
> vim-tiny was installed. Even without that, the Replaces would
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Kurt Pruenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vim-tiny is currently not installable since it conflicts with vim-common:
>
> | aptsh> install vim-tiny
> | Reading package lists... Done
> | Building dependency tree
> | Reading state information... Done
> | The following
Package: vim-common
Version: 1:7.1.293-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.4
Vim-tiny is currently not installable since it conflicts with vim-common:
| aptsh> install vim-tiny
| Reading package lists... Done
| Building dependency tree
| Reading state information... Done
| The followin
4 matches
Mail list logo
