Bug#481976: libaprutil1: do we really need mysql stuff

2008-07-15 Thread Justin B Rye
Stefan Fritsch wrote: >> This seems a bit much. > > mysql-common adds 136k to libmysqlclient15off's 3992k, that's hardly > relevant. I agree that the situation is not optimal but it's better > than the alternatives. And it will be fixed in lenny+1. It's not the diskspace that I'm worried about;

Bug#481976: libaprutil1: do we really need mysql stuff

2008-07-15 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Saturday 12 July 2008, Justin B Rye wrote: > Just sticking my nose in to point out (in case it hasn't been > noticed) that this new dependency means there is now a hard > dependency chain all the way from apache2 to mysql-common. > This seems a bit much. mysql-common adds 136k to libmysqlclien

Bug#481976: libaprutil1: do we really need mysql stuff

2008-07-12 Thread Justin B Rye
Followup-For: Bug #481976 Package: libaprutil1 Version: 1.2.12+dfsg-7 Just sticking my nose in to point out (in case it hasn't been noticed) that this new dependency means there is now a hard dependency chain all the way from apache2 to mysql-common. apache2 Depends: apach

Bug#481976: libaprutil1: do we really need mysql stuff

2008-05-20 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Hi, On Mon, 19 May 2008, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: This is because libaprutil1 is now built with mysql support, which I guess is nice for people using it, butÿÿ I only use libaprutil1 as a dependency for subversion, so I really don't need it and would prefer not have yet another useless lib on my

Bug#481976: libaprutil1: do we really need mysql stuff

2008-05-19 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
Package: libaprutil1 Version: 1.2.12+dfsg-3 Severity: wishlist Hi, this evening, trying to upgrade my debian sid, I saw that the dist-upgrade wanted to install libmysqlclient15off and mysql-common. It's a desktop system and I really have no need for mysql stuff, even libs. This is because libapr