On sam, 2008-07-05 at 21:16 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> Come to think of it, when the CPU was big I was using a terminal, so
> maybe it wasn't time, perhaps it has always been that I have had a
> terminal active (I'm using xterm a lot these days).
HMh, xterm shouldn't have anything to do with
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:30:36 +0200
Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On sam, 2008-07-05 at 02:27 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> > Actually it's still there, it just took 10-20 minutes before it
> > started
> > sucking up the CPU, rather than as soon as the compositing was
> > enable
On sam, 2008-07-05 at 02:27 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> Actually it's still there, it just took 10-20 minutes before it
> started
> sucking up the CPU, rather than as soon as the compositing was
> enabled.
Damn.
Anyway, it seems that some people reproduced the bug with gnome-terminal
some ma
On sam, 2008-07-05 at 01:38 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> This bug appears to be fixed with the latest xrender. I get 10-20% CPU
> on active/deactive window (because of transparency), but only briefly.
> Standby CPU doesn't show up in my top-3 process list, which cuts off at
> below 15% so it's
On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 01:38:41 -0400
Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This bug appears to be fixed with the latest xrender. I get 10-20%
> CPU on active/deactive window (because of transparency), but only
> briefly. Standby CPU doesn't show up in my top-3 process list, which
> cuts o
This bug appears to be fixed with the latest xrender. I get 10-20% CPU
on active/deactive window (because of transparency), but only briefly.
Standby CPU doesn't show up in my top-3 process list, which cuts off at
below 15% so it's less than %15 even with no other processes running.
This is good.
On Thu, 15 May 2008 07:54:53 +0200
Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (please let the bug on copy)
> On mar, 2008-05-13 at 02:17 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> > Sorry, no. I meant when I was using gnome... Now that I'm using
> > Xfce4
> > compositing doesn't work (not that it's th
(please let the bug on copy)
On mar, 2008-05-13 at 02:17 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> Sorry, no. I meant when I was using gnome... Now that I'm using
> Xfce4
> compositing doesn't work (not that it's that big a deal, but it is a
> bug).
Ok so what was the config under Gnome (metacity/compiz/
On sam, 2008-05-10 at 23:29 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> With an accelerated video card with composting enabled in xorg.conf
> and for compositing works under GNOME, using compositing in Window
> Manager Tweaks results in X consuming huge amounts of CPU bringing the
> system to a crawl.
So you
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 22:35:20 +0200
> "Alexander Toresson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Daniel Dickinson
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > With an accelerated video card with composti
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With an accelerated video card with composting enabled in xorg.conf and for
> compositing works under GNOME, using compositing in Window Manager Tweaks
> results in X consuming huge amounts of CPU bringing the system t
Package: xfwm4
Version: 4.4.2-3
Severity: normal
With an accelerated video card with composting enabled in xorg.conf and for
compositing works under GNOME, using compositing in Window Manager Tweaks
results in X consuming huge amounts of CPU bringing the system to a crawl.
-- System Informatio
12 matches
Mail list logo
