Hi,
> I will submit you a cleaner one soon :)
Attached is an updated patch which works with version 0.6.9-3. This
one should be ok to be sent upstream.
Regards,
--
Emmanuel Bouthenot
--- wpasupplicant-0.6.9/debian/control 2009-09-06 12:16:07.0 +0200
+++ wpasupplicant-0.6.9.new/debian
Hi,
> What about the comments made by upstream Developer?
yes, i saw them. They are right, my patch is not ready to be applied
upstream.
I will submit you a cleaner one soon :)
Cheers,
--
Emmanuel Bouthenot
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
On Monday 12 May 2008 00:25:51 Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I think that this:
> > libpcap-dev [kfreebsd], libbsd [kfreebsd]
> >
> > should be:
> > libpcap-dev [kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64], libbsd [kfreebsd-i386
> > kfreebsd-amd64]
> oops
>
>
> > What do you think?
> You are right,
Hi,
> I think that this:
> libpcap-dev [kfreebsd], libbsd [kfreebsd]
>
> should be:
> libpcap-dev [kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64], libbsd [kfreebsd-i386
> kfreebsd-amd64]
oops
> What do you think?
You are right, we have to enumarate the archs.
Thanks.
M.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
tags 480572 pending
thanks
(BCC'd control server)
On Sunday 30 September 2007 04:39:15 Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> Package: wpasupplicant
> Version: 0.6.3-1
> Severity: important
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD due to linux
> specific build options.
>
> The att
5 matches
Mail list logo