* Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-21 22:53]:
> 2008/9/5 Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > * Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 09:11]:
> >
> >> Am Samstag, den 10.05.2008, 07:33 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> >> > On 09/05/08 18:34 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Her
2008/9/5 Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 09:11]:
>
>> Am Samstag, den 10.05.2008, 07:33 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
>> > On 09/05/08 18:34 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>> > > Package: octaviz
>> > > Version: 0.4.7-1
>> > > Severity:
* Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-05 21:57]:
> So, my "solution" would be: patch vtk_surf() to check for NaN and error out
> if it finds them.
Could you do it, please?
What about downgrading the severity of Bug#480431, before octaviz get kicked
off lenny?
--
Rafael
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:15:07PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 09:11]:
>
> > Am Samstag, den 10.05.2008, 07:33 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> > > On 09/05/08 18:34 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> > > > Package: octaviz
> > > > Version: 0
* Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 09:11]:
> Am Samstag, den 10.05.2008, 07:33 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> > On 09/05/08 18:34 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> > > Package: octaviz
> > > Version: 0.4.7-1
> > > Severity: important
> > >
> > > With the attached script and data,
Am Montag, den 09.06.2008, 07:06 -0500 schrieb Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso:
> On 09/06/2008, Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've tracked this back till line 271 of vtkClipPolyData.cxx, where
> > cellScalars->GetComponent(1,0)
> > is a NaN value.
>
> And this doesn't happen wit
On 09/06/2008, Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've tracked this back till line 271 of vtkClipPolyData.cxx, where
> cellScalars->GetComponent(1,0)
> is a NaN value.
And this doesn't happen with the 32bit version, of course?
- Jordi G. H.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Am Samstag, den 10.05.2008, 07:33 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> On 09/05/08 18:34 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> > Package: octaviz
> > Version: 0.4.7-1
> > Severity: important
> >
> > With the attached script and data, Octaviz segfaults on AMD64.
>
> As I discussed with Jordi earlier: t
On 09/05/08 18:34 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> Package: octaviz
> Version: 0.4.7-1
> Severity: important
>
> With the attached script and data, Octaviz segfaults on AMD64.
As I discussed with Jordi earlier: this is arch-specific, it doesn't
happen on i386.
Thomas
--
To UNS
Package: octaviz
Version: 0.4.7-1
Severity: important
With the attached script and data, Octaviz segfaults on AMD64.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-amd64
10 matches
Mail list logo
