On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:39:52PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> The patch itself seems fine in general, and Paul's obviously given it at
> least some testing. On that basis, most of my comments may be a little
> picky again; sorry about that. :-) (Feel free to ignore or disagree
> with any of
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 13:20 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:55:19PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > Looks good, only weird thing is the popcon rank is negative:
>
> This is actually intentional. Using negative numbers is my simple
> solution for inverting the sorting. :) Unfo
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 18:22 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> Okay, seems like I needed to inversely (is that a word?) sort the hash
> keys. A new patch is attached. If you, Paul, find again some time
> testing would be much apppreciated. I'll leave this topic now to give
> the actual maintainers a ch
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:55:19PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 18:22 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
>
> > Okay, seems like I needed to inversely (is that a word?) sort the hash
> > keys. A new patch is attached. If you, Paul, find again some time
> > testing would be much appprec
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 18:22 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> Okay, seems like I needed to inversely (is that a word?) sort the hash
> keys. A new patch is attached. If you, Paul, find again some time
> testing would be much apppreciated. I'll leave this topic now to give
> the actual maintainers a c
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 05:42:09PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> The --pc-local variant produces some strange results though. It puts
> apache2 at the start even though though I use it rarely. Also libc6 is
> at the very end even though it should be used every time I run an app.
Okay, seems like I nee
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 11:04 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> > I guess combining the popcon stuff from it with rc-alert would be good.
>
> Well, I added a similar algorithm to rc-alert now. I'd appreciate if you
> could test it. The patch applies against current trunk, though. So, if
> you find som
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 03:31:19PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 09:23 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
>
> > You're welcome but I just noticed that rc-alert(1) mentions popbugs(1)
> > in the SEE ALSO section. I should have had a look there. It's in the
> > debian-goodies package whi
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 09:23 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> You're welcome but I just noticed that rc-alert(1) mentions popbugs(1)
> in the SEE ALSO section. I should have had a look there. It's in the
> debian-goodies package which says in its description:
>
> popbugs - Display a customized
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 11:02:04AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 15:33 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
>
> > AFAICS popcon doesn't store any popcon information but regenerates it
> > once a week and after using it (for submitting probably :)) it discards
> > the data. I don't see a
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 15:33 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> AFAICS popcon doesn't store any popcon information but regenerates it
> once a week and after using it (for submitting probably :)) it discards
> the data. I don't see a nice way to use that local data without ugly
> piping of a perl scrip
Hi!
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 07:08:12PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I do not use the *-alert scripts because of the ridiculously high number
> of issues they present and the fact that there is no way to easily
> prioritise them. I would like it if they grew two options for sorting
> based on popcon d
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.26
Severity: wishlist
I do not use the *-alert scripts because of the ridiculously high number
of issues they present and the fact that there is no way to easily
prioritise them. I would like it if they grew two options for sorting
based on popcon data. The first
13 matches
Mail list logo
