Thijs Kinkhorst writes:
> On sneon 12 Juny 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> +
>> + These fields contain a list of files with a checksum and size
>> + for each one. Both Checksums-Sha1
>> + and Checksums-Sha256 have the same syntax and differ
>> + only
On sneon 12 Juny 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
> +
> + These fields contain a list of files with a checksum and size
> + for each one. Both Checksums-Sha1
> + and Checksums-Sha256 have the same syntax and differ
> + only in the checksum algorithm used:
Russ Allbery writes:
> Here is proposed wording to document those fields. This change also
> reorders the list of fields in .dsc files to match the order in which
> dpkg-dev writes them. (The actual sections are not reordered since that
> would renumber them and break external cross-references
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 13:29:42 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Objections or seconds?
>
With the typo fixed, seconded.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Julien Cristau writes:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 13:29:42 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> +
>> +Checksums-Sha1 and Checksums-Sha256 are
>> +multiline field. The first line of the field value (the part
> multiline fields
Thanks, fixed.
>> +
>> +In the .dsc fil
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 13:29:42 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
> index 720150d..23a8c90 100644
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -2488,8 +2488,6 @@ Package: libc6
> The syntax and semantics of the fields are described below.
>
>
> -
On 12/06/10 22:29, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Objections or seconds?
>
> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
> index 720150d..23a8c90 100644
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -2488,8 +2488,6 @@ Package: libc6
> The syntax and semantics of the fields are described below.
>
>
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> dpkg has added new fields in the .dsc and .changes file.
> They both can now contains two new fields:
> Checksums-Sha1
> Checksums-Sha256
> They act the same as Files, but use sha1 and sha256 instead of md5.
Here is proposed wording to document those fields. This change
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:39:40 -0700, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> That's actually on my to-do list. I think that belongs in Policy as
>> well (particularly the non-Browser headers, which are used for
>> interoperability within the projec
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:39:40 -0700, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:14:18 -0700, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> said:
>>
>>> Policy is the only formal documentation we have right now of the
>>> control fields in
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:14:18 -0700, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Policy is the only formal documentation we have right now of the
>> control fields in a Debian package, so I think there's at least a prima
>> facie argument for adding a
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:14:18 -0700, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Policy is the only formal documentation we have right now of the
> control fields in a Debian package, so I think there's at least a
> prima facie argument for adding a specification for any new fields to
> Policy, at le
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Various other software, like debsign and dak, had to be changed. The
> policy is not just about what the general package maintainer should
> know, it's also how our tools should interact.
>
> If you don't think the format of the .dsc and .changes should b
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 08:04:44PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:02:55 +0200, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > dpkg has added new fields in the .dsc and .changes file.
>
> > They both can now contains two new fields: Checksums-Sha1
> > Checksums-Sha256
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:02:55 +0200, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> dpkg has added new fields in the .dsc and .changes file.
>> They both can now contains two new fields: Checksums-Sha1
>> Checksums-Sha256
>> They act the same as Files, but
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.3.0
Hi,
dpkg has added new fields in the .dsc and .changes file.
They both can now contains two new fields:
Checksums-Sha1
Checksums-Sha256
They act the same as Files, but use sha1 and sha256 instead of md5.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
16 matches
Mail list logo
