Bug#477646: Security update to suphp breaks old behaviour

2008-05-30 Thread Hans J. Martin [e-netconsulting KG]
Hi, same problem here. We use for every domain.tld and vhost.domain.tld own users. /var/www/ - can be owned by root doamin.tld/vhosts/ - owned by the domain.tld user , domain.tld group vhostname (e

Bug#477646: Security update to suphp breaks old behaviour

2008-05-13 Thread Lehel Bernadt
Same problem here, I think in any slightly complex virtual hosting solution you might find parent dirs not owned by root or by the user. If the parent check has to stay because of security considerations, i would like to suggest that it should be possible to disable it in the suphp.conf file.

Bug#477646: Security update to suphp breaks old behaviour

2008-04-24 Thread Emmanuel Lacour
I agree with you that this check seems to intrusive and unnecessary. But I prefer to have the opinion of upstream developpers before uploading a fix which revert back this. I just pinged them on the suphp list, waiting for a reply :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

Bug#477646: Security update to suphp breaks old behaviour

2008-04-24 Thread Alex Walker
I am also experiencing the same problem in the following situation... /srv/www/ssl/ is the root for our ssl server Within that we have the following directories amongst others: phpmyadmin squirrelmail They are both owned by separate users. With the old version of suphp this worked fine and the s

Bug#477646: Security update to suphp breaks old behaviour

2008-04-24 Thread Sami Haahtinen
Source: suphp Severity: important Version: 0.6.2-1+etch0 Hi, The security update recently published for stable changes the behaviour in a way that requires more strict directory permissions for the parent directories. This problem was discussed in the security bugreport already and there was a p