Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2008, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Guido Günther wrote:
>>> As a discussion on gtk-vnc-devel showed, the problem is actually not in
>>> gtkglext but in GTK itself. It's already fixed upstream:
>>> http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gtk%2B?view=revision&sortby=date
On Mon, May 05, 2008, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Guido Günther wrote:
> > As a discussion on gtk-vnc-devel showed, the problem is actually not in
> > gtkglext but in GTK itself. It's already fixed upstream:
> > http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gtk%2B?view=revision&sortby=date&revision=19969
>
> B
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 08:00:23PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Guido Günther wrote:
> > As a discussion on gtk-vnc-devel showed, the problem is actually not in
> > gtkglext but in GTK itself. It's already fixed upstream:
> > http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gtk%2B?view=revision&sortby=date&r
Guido Günther wrote:
> As a discussion on gtk-vnc-devel showed, the problem is actually not in
> gtkglext but in GTK itself. It's already fixed upstream:
> http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gtk%2B?view=revision&sortby=date&revision=19969
BTW, the patch has been applied to the 2.12 branch too, this is t
As a discussion on gtk-vnc-devel showed, the problem is actually not in
gtkglext but in GTK itself. It's already fixed upstream:
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gtk%2B?view=revision&sortby=date&revision=19969
Here's the explanation from the patch author:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:19:21PM +0100, Dan
5 matches
Mail list logo