Bug#477160: [tex-live] Bug#477160: /usr/bin/xdvizilla: should be installed in /usr/lib/.../

2008-05-01 Thread Hilmar Preusse
tags 477160 + fixed-upstream stop On 25.04.08 Karl Berry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi Stefan, > So maybe we can just remove it from the binary distribution, but > keep the sources in the CVS so that people who use the script > can still download it? > > Sounds good to me. So can y

Bug#477160: [tex-live] Bug#477160: /usr/bin/xdvizilla: should be installed in /usr/lib/.../

2008-04-27 Thread Stefan Ulrich
Hi Karl, > Sounds good to me. So can you apply the patch below (or similar) to > your source for your next release? I checked it in to TL for now. Thanks for the patch; I've applied it to the CVS. > (By the way, are you planning an xdvik release any time soon, or should > we plan on going with

Bug#477160: [tex-live] Bug#477160: /usr/bin/xdvizilla: should be installed in /usr/lib/.../

2008-04-24 Thread Karl Berry
Hi Stefan, So maybe we can just remove it from the binary distribution, but keep the sources in the CVS so that people who use the script can still download it? Sounds good to me. So can you apply the patch below (or similar) to your source for your next release? I checked it in to

Bug#477160: [tex-live] Bug#477160: /usr/bin/xdvizilla: should be installed in /usr/lib/.../

2008-04-23 Thread Stefan Ulrich
Karl Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... and I am wondering whether xdvizilla is useful at all for anything > Seems like it could be removed to me, but this is a question for the > xdvi maintainers. Stefan, I see you're on this list ... ? I just made a few tests with opening files from h

Bug#477160: [tex-live] Bug#477160: /usr/bin/xdvizilla: should be installed in /usr/lib/.../

2008-04-22 Thread Karl Berry
... and I am wondering whether xdvizilla is useful at all for anything Seems like it could be removed to me, but this is a question for the xdvi maintainers. Stefan, I see you're on this list ... ? karl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Bug#477160: /usr/bin/xdvizilla: should be installed in /usr/lib/.../

2008-04-21 Thread Frank Küster
Dear TeX-Live team, Sven Marnach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > xdvizilla is a helper application that should not be called from the > command line. Furthermore it may be dangerous because it deletes the > dvi file given on the command line after showing it. So it should not > be in $PATH, but ra

Bug#477160: /usr/bin/xdvizilla: should be installed in /usr/lib/.../

2008-04-21 Thread Sven Marnach
Frank Küster schrieb am Mo, 21. Apr 2008, um 20:20:22 +0200: > Since you seem to know xdvizilla: Is it useful for anything at all these > days? I don't think I have it anywhere in my firefox configuration, but > dvi files seem to work fine. And if there's a problem with gz'ipped > files (I don't k

Bug#477160: /usr/bin/xdvizilla: should be installed in /usr/lib/.../

2008-04-21 Thread Frank Küster
Sven Marnach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: texlive-base-bin > Version: 2007.dfsg.1-2 > Severity: normal > File: /usr/bin/xdvizilla > > xdvizilla is a helper application that should not be called from the > command line. Furthermore it may be dangerous because it deletes the > dvi file giv

Bug#477160: /usr/bin/xdvizilla: should be installed in /usr/lib/.../

2008-04-21 Thread Sven Marnach
Package: texlive-base-bin Version: 2007.dfsg.1-2 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/xdvizilla xdvizilla is a helper application that should not be called from the command line. Furthermore it may be dangerous because it deletes the dvi file given on the command line after showing it. So it should n