Hi Joey-
On Apr 21, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
Chuck Lever wrote:
What if /etc/mtab is a symlink to a valid writable file that is not /
proc/mounts? The test you introduce below will prevent that case
from
working properly.
Note that util-linux mount does the same thing in this c
Chuck Lever wrote:
> What if /etc/mtab is a symlink to a valid writable file that is not /
> proc/mounts? The test you introduce below will prevent that case from
> working properly.
Note that util-linux mount does the same thing in this case, so this must
be an uncommon case.
umount.nfs also
On Apr 20, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Hi guys,
Would you please consider this patch for inclusion into upstream? It
looks
more than reasonable to me, at least.
What if /etc/mtab is a symlink to a valid writable file that is not /
proc/mounts? The test you introduce belo
Hi guys,
Would you please consider this patch for inclusion into upstream? It looks
more than reasonable to me, at least.
/* Steinar */
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 04:09:28PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Hmm, nmudiff did not send in the patch I expected. Here is a
> corrected/tested one.
>
> --
> see
Hmm, nmudiff did not send in the patch I expected. Here is a
corrected/tested one.
--
see shy jo
diff -ur foo/nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/changelog nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/changelog
--- foo/nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/changelog 2008-04-17 16:06:27.0 -0400
+++ nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/changelog 2008-04
5 matches
Mail list logo
