Bug#460288: Bug#475092: works for me in 3.1.0-5

2009-07-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
close 460288 1:3.1.0-5 thanks Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > Viktor Horvath wrote: > > > The original bug report seems to me a duplicate of #460288. I merged them a few days ago. > > Can you confirm that 1:3.1.0-5 works? [...] > I'm the submitter of #460288. > > Unfortunately I can't test ori

Bug#475092: Bug#460288: Bug#475092: works for me in 3.1.0-5

2009-07-07 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> Viktor Horvath wrote: > > The original bug report seems to me a duplicate of #460288. > > Might be, yes. (Ccing that bug and its submitter...) > > > I had the same problem using 2.4.1-7, but I just upgraded to 3.1.0-5 > > and it works there! > > Too bad the submitter of #475092 never saw your mai

Bug#475092: works for me in 3.1.0-5

2009-07-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
Viktor Horvath wrote: > The original bug report seems to me a duplicate of #460288. Might be, yes. (Ccing that bug and its submitter...) > I had the same problem using 2.4.1-7, but I just upgraded to 3.1.0-5 and > it works there! Too bad the submitter of #475092 never saw your mail because you d

Bug#475092: works for me in 3.1.0-5

2009-07-05 Thread Viktor Horvath
The original bug report seems to me a duplicate of #460288. I had the same problem using 2.4.1-7, but I just upgraded to 3.1.0-5 and it works there! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part