clone 474947 -1
reassign -1 release-notes
retitle -1 Update information about apt MMap problem in release notes
thanks
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:03:49PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> hi bug, hi people, hi d-release
>
> I did some study on bug 474947, that is grave/RC, and is posted against APT.
>
>
Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>> Yes. So, If you claim this have to be fixed before Lenny, go ahead and ask
>> Debian release
>> team what they think about changes in internals of apt and additional
>> month(s) of testing.
>>
>
> I thought that was the point of copy the messages to their list was.
And
>From: Eugene V. Lyubimkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > I have made no such claims. I am merely stating that this is a serious
> > bug. Severe enough to seriously consider delaying the release. This is
> > what the release team gets to decide, which is worse (neither option is
Dropped debian-release from CC.
Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>> - this patch reduces apt speed (not serious though, as I see) on most
>> operations with the cache;
>
> I guess I should ask, do you have an less issues less relevant waiting in
> the wings? While more speed is good, that is worthless if
>From: Eugene V. Lyubimkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> A Mennucc wrote:
> > IMHO one way to decide if to accept a patch during the freeze is to
> > see how large and "important" it is. Does anybody have an example
> > patch, or a description of what code changes would be necessary?
> I had a look on thi
A Mennucc wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:09:58PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>> I must therefore suggest that at the very least, the first part of this
>> bug is too severe to allow to continue on to yet another release. Despite
>> the pain now, that it is better to solve this issue and avo
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:09:58PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> I must therefore suggest that at the very least, the first part of this
> bug is too severe to allow to continue on to yet another release. Despite
> the pain now, that it is better to solve this issue and avoid yet more
> pain dow
>From: A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In this same bug there were reported two different issues, a "Dynamic
> MMap error" and a segmentation fault; moreover some people were using
> APT in Etch, and some other in Lenny.
I believe this is a good estimation of how it breaks down.
> The only way t
retitle 474947 "fix Dynamic MMaps error"
severity 474947 important
tag 474947 -unreproducible
thanks
hi bug, hi people, hi d-release
I did some study on bug 474947, that is grave/RC, and is posted against APT.
Since I was told that the APT team is understaffed, I decided to take
action myself.
9 matches
Mail list logo
