Bug#474608: logcheck: SMTP vs sendmail

2023-03-13 Thread Richard Lewis
control: tags -1 + moreinfo thanks On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:53:10 -0400 andrewn wrote: > Would it be possible to have loccheck using SMTP to send email reports > instead of local /usr/bin/sendmail. I wonder if anyone still follows this bug from 2008: i think it no longer applies: anything providin

Bug#474608: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#474608: logcheck: SMTP vs sendmail

2014-06-11 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> Would it be possible to have loccheck using SMTP to send email reports > instead of local /usr/bin/sendmail. That would break systems running dma instead of a full-fledged SMTP daemon. -- Juliusz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubsc

Bug#474608: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#474608: logcheck: SMTP vs sendmail

2008-04-06 Thread martin f krafft
tags 474608 wontfix help thanks also sprach andrewn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.06.1953 +0200]: > Would it be possible to have loccheck using SMTP to send email > reports instead of local /usr/bin/sendmail. This would improve > issues with logcheck running on MTA system using mailscanners. Patch

Bug#474608: logcheck: SMTP vs sendmail

2008-04-06 Thread andrewn
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.54 Severity: wishlist Hi, Would it be possible to have loccheck using SMTP to send email reports instead of local /usr/bin/sendmail. This would improve issues with logcheck running on MTA system using mailscanners. Thanks, Andrew. -- System Information: Debian Re