Sorry for the late reply to this Aurelien.
On Sunday 11 May 2008, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I have just checked-in this patch.
Thanks. The results are starting to become visible:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/06/msg00217.html
> For the future, I wonder while those too small udeb are
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 09:43:18PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Package: glibc
> Version: 2.7-10
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: d-i patch
>
> For Etch we fixed debhelper and most library packages that provide udebs to
> improve the dependencies generated for udebs, but we skipped glibc then as
> it's
On Saturday 03 May 2008, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 09:43:18PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > We are aware the patch is a bit of a hack and the list of libs in the
> > helper script will require some maintenance. We have discussed whether
> > this could be implemented in debhelper in
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 09:43:18PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> We are aware the patch is a bit of a hack and the list of libs in the helper
> script will require some maintenance. We have discussed whether this could
> be implemented in debhelper instead, but this solution was preferred:
Seems rea
Package: glibc
Version: 2.7-10
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
For Etch we fixed debhelper and most library packages that provide udebs to
improve the dependencies generated for udebs, but we skipped glibc then as
it's less important when the installer is running (as libc is always
included
5 matches
Mail list logo
