On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 04:56:05PM -0300, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:39:56PM -0300, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL
> >> PROTECTED]> was heard to
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:39:56PM -0300, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL
>> PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
>>> I guess we have enough changes for a new release. Please give it a
>>> test and upload :-)
>>
>> A
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:39:56PM -0300, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
>> I guess we have enough changes for a new release. Please give it a
>> test and upload :-)
>
> A whole pile of files change when I run "dpkg-buildpack
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:39:56PM -0300, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> I guess we have enough changes for a new release. Please give it a
> test and upload :-)
A whole pile of files change when I run "dpkg-buildpackage". Is that
expected? Should I just check them in
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:39:56PM -0300, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 09:14:47AM -0300, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> >> <...>
> >> > In my own tests, my changes w
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 09:14:47AM -0300, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
>> <...>
>> > In my own tests, my changes work fine and produce the same results
>> > on files that used to work (e.g., from "apt-config dump"), but thi
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 09:14:47AM -0300, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> <...>
> > In my own tests, my changes work fine and produce the same results
> > on files that used to work (e.g., from "apt-config dump"), but this is a
> > more invasive change than my last patch.
<...>
> In my own tests, my changes work fine and produce the same results
> on files that used to work (e.g., from "apt-config dump"), but this is a
> more invasive change than my last patch. I'd appreciate it if someone
> else could review it.
<...>
I've not yet tested it but from first looki
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.12
Severity: normal
The apt configuration parser has an arbitrary limit of 1024 bytes
per line. This has recently bitten aptitude; I made some interface
strings configurable, and it turns out that in other languages such as
Russian these strings are more than 1024 byte
9 matches
Mail list logo
