On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:00:34AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > It fails to work with dpkg-dev 1.14.17 from experimental. This is due
> > to the new Checksums fields, I think. Would be nice to get fixed
> > before we upload a new dpkg version to un
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:27:05PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:00:34AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > It fails to work with dpkg-dev 1.14.17 from experimental. This is due
> > to the new Checksums fields, I think. Would be nice to get fixed
> > before we upload a n
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:00:34AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> It fails to work with dpkg-dev 1.14.17 from experimental. This is due
> to the new Checksums fields, I think. Would be nice to get fixed
> before we upload a new dpkg version to unstable, and people can no
> longer properly use duploa
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:00:34AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Package: dupload
> Version: 2.6.3.3
> Severity: important
>
> It fails to work with dpkg-dev 1.14.17 from experimental. This is due
> to the new Checksums fields, I think. Would be nice to get fixed
> before we upload a new dpkg vers
Package: dupload
Version: 2.6.3.3
Severity: important
It fails to work with dpkg-dev 1.14.17 from experimental. This is due
to the new Checksums fields, I think. Would be nice to get fixed
before we upload a new dpkg version to unstable, and people can no
longer properly use dupload.
thanks,
guil
5 matches
Mail list logo
