On Sunday 27 Apr 2008 12:20:30 am William J Poser wrote:
> U+201C, U+201D,and U+2212 are already handled by the -e option.
> I don't understand why there would be a problem with them.
>
> Version 4.7, now available on my web site, adds U+FB00-U+FB04 and U+FB06
> to the -x option. It also adds a -B
U+201C, U+201D,and U+2212 are already handled by the -e option.
I don't understand why there would be a problem with them.
Version 4.7, now available on my web site, adds U+FB00-U+FB04 and U+FB06
to the -x option. It also adds a -B option as a shorthand for cdefx
and a -P option that passes throu
Package: uni2ascii
Version: 4.4-1
Severity: minor
I would like to discuss today the Unicodes
¯ ’“”− ff fi fl ffi ...
that is
00AF 2019 201C 201D 2212 FB00 FB01 FB02 FB03 ...
You see, I noticed them when I used pdftotext on
http://www.cs.ucr.edu/~anirban/Anir-networking07.pdf
and then tired to read the
3 matches
Mail list logo
