Bug#469138: git-buildpackage: Seconded

2008-03-06 Thread Guido Günther
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:42:53PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Guido Günther wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 08:07:00PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> How does that help? I still have to comment the builder option in > >> gbp.conf when I do my usual debuild builds and uncomment (read: edit >

Bug#469138: git-buildpackage: Seconded

2008-03-05 Thread Michael Biebl
Guido Günther wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 08:07:00PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >> How does that help? I still have to comment the builder option in >> gbp.conf when I do my usual debuild builds and uncomment (read: edit >> gbp.conf) when I do the pbuilder build. >> That's very unconvenient.

Bug#469138: git-buildpackage: Seconded

2008-03-05 Thread Guido Günther
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 09:42:05AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: [..snip..] > A --builder command line option for g-b-p would really be great for > that. (p.s: You can look at svn-buildpackage and how it handles option > passing). In what way is what svn-buildpackage does different from what git-bui

Bug#469138: git-buildpackage: Seconded

2008-03-05 Thread Guido Günther
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 08:07:00PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > How does that help? I still have to comment the builder option in > gbp.conf when I do my usual debuild builds and uncomment (read: edit > gbp.conf) when I do the pbuilder build. > That's very unconvenient. You're talking different th

Bug#469138: git-buildpackage: Seconded

2008-03-05 Thread Michael Biebl
Guido Günther wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 09:42:05AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >> My usual workflow, is to develop in my working environment (using >> debuild) and creating the final packages using pbuilder. Having to edit >> the .gbp.conf file every time is rather cumbersome. >> A --builder

Bug#469138: git-buildpackage: Seconded

2008-03-05 Thread Guido Günther
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 09:42:05AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > My usual workflow, is to develop in my working environment (using > debuild) and creating the final packages using pbuilder. Having to edit > the .gbp.conf file every time is rather cumbersome. > A --builder command line option for g-

Bug#469138: git-buildpackage: Seconded

2008-03-05 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: git-buildpackage Followup-For: Bug #469138 I'd like to second that request. The current approach of having to edit a config file (and a script file in /usr/local/bin) is to inflexible. My usual workflow, is to develop in my working environment (using debuild) and creating the final pack