An explanation for the kernel team: certain types of processes seem
to freeze the entire user desktop for long periods of time (many
seconds). I don't know all the factors that are involved, but programs
that start up and immediately make a large number of I/O calls exhibit
this behavior. One o
reassign 468075 linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
found 468075 2.6.24-4
thanks
Hello kernel maintainers,
Please see this bug log regarding a "soft lockup". A root processes
looping around time() is sufficient to make the system unusable.
Mar 21 13:06:39 libra kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 2
Thanks for the analysis. Why does it only affect aptitude sometimes
(after an upgrade is aborted)? Is that due to some cache? Why isn't
apt/itude using mmap (?)?
Out of curiousity, what kernel and hardware are you using?
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 08:49:13AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Fri,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 07:14:15AM -0700, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Interestingly, if I run these on a text console, other text consoles
> and the programs running in them are unaffected. Only X suffers a
> complete freeze.
Here's an odd thing.
If I ssh to loc
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:24:17PM -0400, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 06:31:13PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Most likely some critical part of your X session wanted to access the
> > disk, and it was blocked out by apt. I'm not sure how to
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 06:31:13PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:55:19PM -0400, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
> > Hi Apt team, do you know anything about what can cause this ?
> >
> > Benoît, what kernel version?
> >
> > sudo aptitude safe-upgr
#468075 - sudo: system freeze
http://bugs.debian.org./468075
Oops, I'm awfully sorry, but I didn't actually run the command you
gave. When I did, I was immediately able to reproduce the problem.
Bdale, have you tried safe-upgrade under sudo under X?
I suspect this is not a sudo bug, but an apt o
Le vendredi 29 février 2008 à 14:46 -0500, Justin Pryzby a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:54:32PM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> > Le jeudi 28 février 2008 à 14:48 -0500, Justin Pryzby a écrit :
> > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:09:22PM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> What is your path under su
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:54:32PM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> Le jeudi 28 février 2008 à 14:48 -0500, Justin Pryzby a écrit :
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:09:22PM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
>
> > > no, everything is frozen. ^Z won't work until the system gets back to
> > > normal.
> > What a
Le jeudi 28 février 2008 à 14:48 -0500, Justin Pryzby a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:09:22PM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> > no, everything is frozen. ^Z won't work until the system gets back to
> > normal.
> What about top output? Starting from top defaults (no .toprc), press:
It can't
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:09:22PM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
>
> Le jeudi 28 février 2008 à 11:49 -0500, Justin Pryzby a écrit :
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 05:44:37PM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> > >
> > > Le mercredi 27 février 2008 à 15:08 -0500, Justin Pryzby a écrit :
> > > > On Wed, Feb
Le jeudi 28 février 2008 à 11:49 -0500, Justin Pryzby a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 05:44:37PM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> >
> > Le mercredi 27 février 2008 à 15:08 -0500, Justin Pryzby a écrit :
> > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 09:35:23AM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> >
> > > > I've attach
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 05:44:37PM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
>
> Le mercredi 27 février 2008 à 15:08 -0500, Justin Pryzby a écrit :
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 09:35:23AM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
>
> > > I've attached my sudoers file. No DNS names.
> > > I can't think of any DNS issue that w
Le mercredi 27 février 2008 à 15:08 -0500, Justin Pryzby a écrit :
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 09:35:23AM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> > I've attached my sudoers file. No DNS names.
> > I can't think of any DNS issue that would lock all but root processes for
> > 5s.
> >
> > I've upgraded to 1.6
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 09:35:23AM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
>
> Le mardi 26 février 2008 à 16:54 -0700, Bdale Garbee a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 23:01 +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> > > Package: sudo
> > > Version: 1.6.9p11-1+b1
> >
> > I don't recognize that version number. Where did
Le mardi 26 février 2008 à 16:54 -0700, Bdale Garbee a écrit :
> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 23:01 +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> > Package: sudo
> > Version: 1.6.9p11-1+b1
>
> I don't recognize that version number. Where did you get this package
> from?
sid from ftp://ftp.proxad.net/mirrors/ftp.debia
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 23:01 +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> Package: sudo
> Version: 1.6.9p11-1+b1
I don't recognize that version number. Where did you get this package
from?
> When i run in a root shell "aptitude safe-upgrade", it works fine, no
> freeze, aptitude outputs normally and immediatel
Package: sudo
Version: 1.6.9p11-1+b1
Severity: normal
Hello,
When i run in a root shell "aptitude safe-upgrade", it works fine, no
freeze, aptitude outputs normally and immediately.
But if i do from my current user "sudo aptitude safe-upgrade", the
whole system freezes for 5s, then it unlocks an
18 matches
Mail list logo
