Bug#462803: mount.cifs not respecting name resolve order

2008-02-10 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Michael, On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 06:44:32PM -0500, Michael Marsh wrote: > On Jan 29, 2008 6:06 PM, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Two possible workarounds for using netbios name resolution with mount.cifs: > > - install the winbind package, and enable "wins" for hosts in > > /

Bug#462803: mount.cifs not respecting name resolve order

2008-01-29 Thread Michael Marsh
On Jan 29, 2008 6:06 PM, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Two possible workarounds for using netbios name resolution with mount.cifs: > > - install the winbind package, and enable "wins" for hosts in > /etc/nsswitch.conf (due to your ISP's broken DNS servers, I suppose you'd > need t

Bug#462803: mount.cifs not respecting name resolve order

2008-01-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 02:20:12PM -0500, Michael Marsh wrote: > On Jan 27, 2008 2:10 PM, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > mount.cifs doesn't honor smb.conf, yes. It only resolves hostnames using > > gethostbyname(), and only supports overriding this resolution using an ip= > > mount

Bug#462803: mount.cifs not respecting name resolve order

2008-01-27 Thread Michael Marsh
On Jan 27, 2008 2:10 PM, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mount.cifs doesn't honor smb.conf, yes. It only resolves hostnames using > gethostbyname(), and only supports overriding this resolution using an ip= > mount option. Presumably this worked for you before only because you were >

Bug#462803: mount.cifs not respecting name resolve order

2008-01-27 Thread Steve Langasek
retitle 462803 mount.cifs does not respect name resolve order forcemerge 311709 462803 thanks On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:06:03AM -0500, Mike Marsh wrote: > Package: smbclient > Version: 3.0.28-2+b1 > Severity: normal > I'm lucky enough to be using Verizon DSL for my network connection, > which me