Bug#461761: aptitude: segfaults when accessing options

2008-04-01 Thread Bram Senders
First of all: On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 07:00 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > Does 0.4.11.1-1 segfault for you? Ha! No, it doesn't segfault anymore! It appears to have fixed itself... No idea how, though. > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:20:07PM +0200, Bram Senders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > was heard to

Bug#461761: aptitude: segfaults when accessing options

2008-03-31 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:20:07PM +0200, Bram Senders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > To be sure that the patch what fixes it, I de-applied it and make > again... but now aptitude still doesn't segfault! Hmm. It doesn't > segfault anymore either with or without the patch. Maybe it's th

Bug#461761: aptitude: segfaults when accessing options

2008-03-31 Thread Bram Senders
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:20:07PM +0200, Bram Senders wrote: > To be sure that the patch what fixes it, I de-applied it and make > again... but now aptitude still doesn't segfault! Hmm. It doesn't > segfault anymore either with or without the patch. Maybe it's the build > options? I try a stra

Bug#461761: aptitude: segfaults when accessing options

2008-03-31 Thread Bram Senders
On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 09:39 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 01:46:47PM +0200, Bram Senders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > was heard to say: > > ==5065== Invalid read of size 1 > > > ==5065==at 0xFFBBC7C: strlen (mc_replace_strmem.c:242) > > ==5065==by 0xF6593D4: __dcigettext

Bug#461761: aptitude: segfaults when accessing options

2008-03-30 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 01:46:47PM +0200, Bram Senders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 19:50 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:39:21AM +0100, Bram Senders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > was heard to say: > > > I am also on PowerPC (as is the origin

Bug#461761: aptitude: segfaults when accessing options

2008-03-30 Thread Bram Senders
On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 19:50 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:39:21AM +0100, Bram Senders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > was heard to say: > > I am also on PowerPC (as is the original reporter), and I can reproduce > > this on my machine. > > What do you get if you install valgri

Bug#461761: aptitude: segfaults when accessing options

2008-03-29 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:39:21AM +0100, Bram Senders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > I am also on PowerPC (as is the original reporter), and I can reproduce > this on my machine. What do you get if you install valgrind and run valgrind --log-file=/tmp/aptitude.grind aptitude ,

Bug#461761: aptitude: segfaults when accessing options

2008-03-29 Thread Bram Senders
Hi there, I am also on PowerPC (as is the original reporter), and I can reproduce this on my machine. GDB output follow: === 8< === (gdb) bt full #0 widget (this=0x1071bb18, __vtt_parm=) at /usr/include/sigc++-2.0/sigc++/limit_reference.h:81 No locals. #1 0x0fde6dd4 in passthrough (this=,

Bug#461761: aptitude: segfaults when accessing options

2008-01-20 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 05:02:55PM +0100, "Joseph D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > --- Please enter the report below this line. --- > I start aptitude as root without any option, press C-t to access the menu, go > to options and press enter: segfault. What architecture are you runni