Bug#460959: libfam-ruby: invalid syntax in debian/control

2008-03-04 Thread Luca Falavigna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jon Bernard wrote: >> Has anyone verified that the missing space fixes the problem? If that's >> it, then I'll upload shortly. With or without the space, the package >> builds fine for me. Let me know. It builds fine in our buildds after adding the mi

Bug#460959: libfam-ruby: invalid syntax in debian/control

2008-02-12 Thread Jon Bernard
* Luca Falavigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > No, the problem is in debian/control: > > - -Package:libfam-ruby > +Package: libfam-ruby Has anyone verified that the missing space fixes the problem? If that's it, then I'll upload shortly. With or

Bug#460959: libfam-ruby: invalid syntax in debian/control

2008-02-08 Thread Jon Bernard
* Luca Falavigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > No, the problem is in debian/control: > > - -Package:libfam-ruby > +Package: libfam-ruby Thanks for the report guys, I'll find some time this weekend and get the patch uploaded. -- Jon Bernard

Bug#460959: libfam-ruby: invalid syntax in debian/control

2008-01-30 Thread Luca Falavigna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 No, the problem is in debian/control: - -Package:libfam-ruby +Package: libfam-ruby Thank you. - -- Luca Falavigna Ubuntu MOTU Developer GPG Key: 0x86BC2A50 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Moz