Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 07:14:49PM +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
On Monday 25 May 2009 07:39:47 Eugen Dedu wrote:
I think we should indeed remove the build-conflicts and remove from
rules the test. This was probably useful long time ago, I do not think
it is still applicable
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 07:14:49PM +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Monday 25 May 2009 07:39:47 Eugen Dedu wrote:
> > I think we should indeed remove the build-conflicts and remove from
> > rules the test. This was probably useful long time ago, I do not think
> > it is still applicable.
> Looking
Mark Purcell wrote:
On Monday 25 May 2009 07:39:47 Eugen Dedu wrote:
I think we should indeed remove the build-conflicts and remove from
rules the test. This was probably useful long time ago, I do not think
it is still applicable.
Eugen,
Looking at the ubuntu changelog, it appears they trie
On Monday 25 May 2009 07:39:47 Eugen Dedu wrote:
> I think we should indeed remove the build-conflicts and remove from
> rules the test. This was probably useful long time ago, I do not think
> it is still applicable.
Eugen,
Looking at the ubuntu changelog, it appears they tried just that and th
I think we should indeed remove the build-conflicts and remove from
rules the test. This was probably useful long time ago, I do not think
it is still applicable.
--
Eugen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
5 matches
Mail list logo