On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:35:39AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Simon Horman]
> > thanks for tracking down this problem, and thanks doubly for the
> > patch. Do you think that this change warrants a fresh upload or can
> > it wait?
>
> I believe it warrants a quick upload, as it will brea
[Simon Horman]
> thanks for tracking down this problem, and thanks doubly for the
> patch. Do you think that this change warrants a fresh upload or can
> it wait?
I believe it warrants a quick upload, as it will break the package
when installed on a system where dependency based boot sequencing i
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:51:10AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:22:22PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> >
> > Package: heartbeat
> > Version: 2.1.3-1
> > Tags: patch
> > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Usertags: incorrect-dependency
> >
> > When testing depend
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:22:22PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Package: heartbeat
> Version: 2.1.3-1
> Tags: patch
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: incorrect-dependency
>
> When testing dependency based boot sequencing, I discovered what I
> believe is a bug in the init.d
Package: heartbeat
Version: 2.1.3-1
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: incorrect-dependency
When testing dependency based boot sequencing, I discovered what I
believe is a bug in the init.d/heartbeta script. It need a mounted
/usr/, but do not depend on $remote_fs which is t
5 matches
Mail list logo