tags 459214 pending
thanks
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 00:11 -0500, Brad Jorsch wrote:
> > It looks reasonable to get rid of libwww. I'll coordinate with upstream
> > of wmweather+ regarding this issue.
> >
> > It could happen that I have to do the port myself (upstream didn't do
> > anything for year
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:56:53PM +0100, Martin Stigge wrote:
>
> It looks reasonable to get rid of libwww. I'll coordinate with upstream
> of wmweather+ regarding this issue.
>
> It could happen that I have to do the port myself (upstream didn't do
> anything for years now, but there were also
On Fri, January 4, 2008 16:56, Martin Stigge wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 16:32 +, Regis Boudin wrote:
>> wmweather+ is one of the 6 packages that build-depend on it, one of the
>> two actually using it, the other being amaya which I maintain.
>>
>> My current plan is to adopt w3c-libwww un
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 16:32 +, Regis Boudin wrote:
> wmweather+ is one of the 6 packages that build-depend on it, one of the
> two actually using it, the other being amaya which I maintain.
>
> My current plan is to adopt w3c-libwww until it can be removed, so both
> packages will have to fin
Package: wmweather+
Version: 2.9-4
Usertags: libwww
Hi,
Due to the fact that it's pretty much unmaintained, we're working on
removing libwww from the archive, see bug #440436.
wmweather+ is one of the 6 packages that build-depend on it, one of the
two actually using it, the other being amaya whi
5 matches
Mail list logo
