Bug#457729: optipng could optimize better

Hi Nelson, On 2007-12-25 01:10:06 -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > Feel free to send a message if you have more problems or doubts, and > thank you for your interest in OptiPNG. BTW, I didn't see the version either though it is displayed at the beginning, because OptiPNG outputs too much (of

Bug#457729: optipng could optimize better

I'm closing this bug for the same reason as 457728 (it was an old version in my bin directory). In the past, I found that advpng gave better results than optipng -o9, but it seems to be no longer the case! Regards, -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: 100% acces

Bug#457729: optipng could optimize better

Hi Vincent! On Dec 25, 2007 1:05 AM, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm closing this bug for the same reason as 457728 (it was an old > version in my bin directory). In the past, I found that advpng > gave better results than optipng -o9, but it seems to be no longer > the case! Goo

Bug#457729: optipng could optimize better

Hi Vincent! On Dec 25, 2007 12:24 AM, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As shown on the following example, optipng could optimize better. > > img2.png > img1.png optimized with "optipng -o9". > > img3.png > img2.png optimized with "advpng -z -4". > > img4.png > img3.png optimized

Bug#457729: optipng could optimize better

Package: optipng Version: 0.5.5-1 Severity: wishlist As shown on the following example, optipng could optimize better. img2.png img1.png optimized with "optipng -o9". img3.png img2.png optimized with "advpng -z -4". img4.png img3.png optimized with "optipng -o9". The sizes: 2447 img1.pn