Excerpts from Samuel Tardieu's message of Mon Oct 13 18:13:08 -0400 2008:
> Agreed, it should be eliminated and the system default should be
> kept. Anyway, I withdraw my request, we switched to "socat" today after
> I had a look at the "netcat" code, and it fits its job perfectly, so we
> won't b
* Decklin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-13 17:46:59 -0400]
| Excerpts from Samuel Tardieu's message of Mon Oct 13 04:29:55 -0400 2008:
|
| > Loic's patch is not so about the *number* of file descriptors
| > but about the *largest* file descriptor that can be used in
| > netcat.
|
| Yes, I
Excerpts from Samuel Tardieu's message of Mon Oct 13 04:29:55 -0400 2008:
> Loic's patch is not so about the *number* of file descriptors
> but about the *largest* file descriptor that can be used in
> netcat.
Yes, I know how select(2) works; since its usage was fixed in the
other patch, I don't
Loic's patch is not so about the *number* of file descriptors
but about the *largest* file descriptor that can be used in
netcat.
The previous behaviour (FD_SETSIZE set to 16) only allows for
file descriptors numbered from 0 to 15. If netcat is forked from
a program which already use those, it wil
4 matches
Mail list logo
