On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 08:21 +0100, Jan Prunk wrote:
> Why not updating to a newer Splix version, so that "we" (I own ML2010)
> can all use splix ?
I'm neither the maintainer of this package nor a Debian developer, so I
can't upload such a package. However, it probably won't take long to
prepare a
Why not updating to a newer Splix version, so that "we" (I own ML2010)
can all use splix ?
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> severity 455795 important
> thanks
>
> I'm downgrading this bug because the package is still useful to most of
> its users (I can
severity 455795 important
thanks
I'm downgrading this bug because the package is still useful to most of
its users (I can print to my Xerox Phaser 6100 just fine, for instance).
--
Sam Morris
http://robots.org.uk/
PGP key id 1024D/5EA01078
3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869 B219 7FDB 5EA0 1078
si
Package: splix
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is the report from /var/log/cups/error_log
E [11/Dec/2007:22:13:27 +0100] PID 9965 (/usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertospl2)
crashed on signal 11!
E [11/Dec/2007:22:13:27 +0100] [Job 225] Job stopped due to f
4 matches
Mail list logo