Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 11223 March 1977, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> I read that as "it's ok if you have a good reason". Therefore, I think
>> a lintian warning would be more appropriate than an error. Attached
>> patch implements this change. Please consider applying it.
>
On Tuesday 4 December 2007 16:51, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > I read that as "it's ok if you have a good reason". Therefore, I think a
> > lintian warning would be more appropriate than an error. Attached patch
> > implements this change. Please consider applying it.
>
> That seems to be a good case f
On 11223 March 1977, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> In general, symbolic links within a top-level directory should be relative,
>> and symbolic links pointing from one top-level directory into another
>> should be absolute. (A top-level directory is a sub-directory of the root
>> directory /.)
> I read
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.36
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi!
In my package "mailman", I have converted two symlinks from relative to
absolute. The relative symlinks gave trouble for a number of different users
that had symlinked the targets themselves, and linking to relative links
gives
4 matches
Mail list logo
