Bug#454212: megahal: Confirmed in etch

2008-02-11 Thread Laurent Fousse
Hello, * Giuliani Vito, Ivan [Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 11:36:34PM +0100]: > The backtrace is attached. > > The megahal.brn file that it tries to open doesn't exists. Maybe it is > trying to make some read/write operation on it without checking if it > has been correctly opened? Thanks for the backtr

Bug#454212: megahal: Confirmed in etch

2008-02-10 Thread Giuliani Vito, Ivan
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 02:58:01PM +0100, Laurent Fousse wrote: > Hello, > > * Neil McGovern [Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:42:23AM +]: > > Package: megahal > > Version: 9.1.1a-1 > > Followup-For: Bug #454212 > > > > Confirmed using etch i386 (though an amd64 processor). Attached output > > of mega

Bug#454212: megahal: Confirmed in etch

2008-01-25 Thread Laurent Fousse
Hello, * Neil McGovern [Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:42:23AM +]: > Package: megahal > Version: 9.1.1a-1 > Followup-For: Bug #454212 > > Confirmed using etch i386 (though an amd64 processor). Attached output > of megahal and strace. Could you try a version with debugging symbols included and give

Bug#454212: megahal: Confirmed in etch

2007-12-19 Thread Laurent Fousse
Hello, * Neil McGovern [Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:42:23AM +]: > Confirmed using etch i386 (though an amd64 processor). Attached output > of megahal and strace. Thanks for reproducing this bug. Unfortunately the backtrack doesn't give much information. I'll try to figure out what's going on from

Bug#454212: megahal: Confirmed in etch

2007-12-19 Thread Neil McGovern
Package: megahal Version: 9.1.1a-1 Followup-For: Bug #454212 Confirmed using etch i386 (though an amd64 processor). Attached output of megahal and strace. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked