Hi Colin,
* Colin Leroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-05 14:57]:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:35:03 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> > And to be honest, I am not going to contact any of you guys if I find
> > some bug again, simple because you showed that you are not able to
> > handle this just because of som
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:35:03 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
> And to be honest, I am not going to contact any of you guys if I find
> some bug again, simple because you showed that you are not able to
> handle this just because of some bad press.
Dude, it's not about bad press. It's about following
Hi Ricardo,
* Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-05 13:15]:
> On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:58:26 +0100
> Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Colin Leroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-04 13:05]:
> > > This bug is going to be fixed.
> > >
> > > Would it be too much to ask the submitter to h
Hi Nico,
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:58:26 +0100
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Colin,
> * Colin Leroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-04 13:05]:
> > This bug is going to be fixed.
> >
> > Would it be too much to ask the submitter to handle security issues
> > privately until they're reso
Hi Colin,
* Colin Leroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-04 13:05]:
> This bug is going to be fixed.
>
> Would it be too much to ask the submitter to handle security issues
> privately until they're resolved, or is it more interesting to have
> them published all over the place[*] when no solution is
This bug is going to be fixed.
Would it be too much to ask the submitter to handle security issues
privately until they're resolved, or is it more interesting to have
them published all over the place[*] when no solution is available?
[*]
http://secwatch.org/advisories/1019661/
http://www.securit
6 matches
Mail list logo
