Bug#313579: Bug#453331: intent to NMU

2008-06-23 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:51:54PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > > Ok. Since I don't hear any objections about #313579 and #418273, I assume > > you're fine with the proposed fixes in these too. > > You can't *possibly* be serious. > > If I say "I'm ok if you upload a NMU for *this* one", I'm

Bug#313579: Bug#453331: intent to NMU

2008-06-23 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Robert Millan [Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:44:48 +0200]: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:38:53PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > * Robert Millan [Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:00:35 +0200]: > > > #453331: default nodes.dat URL is broken, please replace > > I'm ok if you upload a NMU for this one, you're right len

Bug#313579: Bug#453331: intent to NMU

2008-06-22 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:38:53PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Robert Millan [Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:00:35 +0200]: > > > Hi! > > Hello Robert, > > > #453331: default nodes.dat URL is broken, please replace > > I'm ok if you upload a NMU for this one, you're right lenny should not > ship with

Bug#453331: intent to NMU

2008-06-22 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Robert Millan [Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:00:35 +0200]: > Hi! Hello Robert, > #453331: default nodes.dat URL is broken, please replace I'm ok if you upload a NMU for this one, you're right lenny should not ship with that bug under any circumstance. If you could commit your changes into a separate