found 453242 1.14.1-5
tags 453242 +unreproducible
severity 453242 normal
thanks
Version 1.14.1-5 re-enables compiling using ffcall, so this bug could
reappear on Lucas' setup.
I'm also downgrading it to normal severity, though, because:
- it hasn't caused any real problems yet.
- even though it m
On 28/02/08 at 12:10 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote:
> I may possibly need to reopen this bug in the next upload of
> gnustep-base...
>
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:11:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> Do you have any security-related features enabled? PaX, grsecurity,
> >> SELin
I may possibly need to reopen this bug in the next upload of
gnustep-base...
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:11:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Do you have any security-related features enabled? PaX, grsecurity,
>> SELinux, etc.? It could be related to GNUstep bug #18968.
>>
>> ht
severity 453242 important
thanks
While this bug is rather severe, it evidently hasn't caused problems so
far (I guess not many people have been running GNUstep on Opeterons,
since nobody's reported a bug yet).
The proper fix (for now, until ffcall gets fixed) seems to be to use
libffi instead of
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:11:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 11/12/07 at 21:10 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote:
>> Do you have any security-related features enabled? PaX, grsecurity,
>> SELinux, etc.? It could be related to GNUstep bug #18968.
>>
>> http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/
On 11/12/07 at 21:10 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:44:23 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> > on i386.
>
> > I'm building in an i386 chroot on amd64. Maybe that's part
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:44:23 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on i386.
> I'm building in an i386 chroot on amd64. Maybe that's part of the
> problem.
> Relevant part:
>> checking if ffcall trampo
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:50:56PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 28/11/07 at 23:51 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote:
>
> However, the test probably tries to *run* the code, not just compile
> it.
That's right, it is run via the AC_RUN_IFELSE macro, where the
condition for cross-compiling is set to
On 28/11/07 at 23:51 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:44:23 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> > on i386.
>
> > I'm building in an i386 chroot on amd64. Maybe that's part
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:44:23 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on i386.
> I'm building in an i386 chroot on amd64. Maybe that's part of the
> problem.
It compiles fine on my machine, which is a nor
Package: gnustep-base
version: 1.14.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
I'm building in an i386 chroot on amd64. Maybe that's part of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
