Bug#453065: getfem++ 4.0

2009-09-26 Thread Xavier Vello
Hello > > 4. I would like to suggest that getfem is moved to the "Debian > > Scientific Computing Team", since this team already maintains many > > similar packages. As I haven't contacted neither the people who worked > > on getfem in the past nor the "Debian Scientific Computing Team" yet, > > I

Bug#453065: getfem++ 4.0

2009-09-23 Thread Ana Guerrero
Hi Konstantinos, On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 02:01:21PM +0200, Konstantinos Poulios wrote: > Hi all, > > I've uploaded my last packaging effort based on the official release > of getfem version 4.0.0 here: > > http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=getfem > First

Bug#453065: getfem++ 4.0

2009-09-23 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
Hi all, I've uploaded my last packaging effort based on the official release of getfem version 4.0.0 here: http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=getfem Some remarks: 1. In accordance with the tar.gz-name and the SO-NAME of the last upstream release I've remove

Bug#453065: getfem++ 4.0

2009-08-26 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
Hi, I see that the actual packaging work for getfem++ is being done here: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-kde/krap/getfem%2B%2B/trunk/ Unfortunately the current packaging status fails to build the getfem++ code from the upstream svn-repository, mainly because of upstream autotools modifications. H