Bug#451565: jed-extra: no Suggests dependency on ispell

2007-11-18 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Paul Boekholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-18 16:34]: > 2007/11/17, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Yes, the current ispell.sl give cryptic error messages when ispell/aspell is > > not installed : > > > > * In the *ispell* buffer: > >execvp of aspell failed! > > > > * In

Bug#451565: jed-extra: no Suggests dependency on ispell

2007-11-18 Thread Paul Boekholt
2007/11/17, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yes, the current ispell.sl give cryptic error messages when ispell/aspell is > not installed : > > * In the *ispell* buffer: >execvp of aspell failed! > > * In the echo area: >Ispell crashed! > > This two messages give the fa

Bug#451565: jed-extra: no Suggests dependency on ispell

2007-11-17 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2007-11-17 15:21+0100 Rafael Laboissiere wrote: * Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-17 14:17]: There should be an error message that tells “ispell not found,” but nothing more. Yes, the current ispell.sl give cryptic error messages when ispell/aspell is not installed : * In the *

Bug#451565: jed-extra: no Suggests dependency on ispell

2007-11-17 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-17 14:17]: > I don't think it is a good suggestion. I found only one package in > Debian that does so: > > [snip] > > And if you start with this, where will you stop? svn, cvs, gcc, make, > sendmail, … This is a sensible comment. I think I tend to agr

Bug#451565: jed-extra: no Suggests dependency on ispell

2007-11-17 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hallo Rafael, Rafael Laboissiere schrieb am Sat 17. Nov, 09:16 (+0100): > * Alan W. Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-16 15:54]: > > > Package: jed-extra > > Version: 2.4.2-1 > > Severity: minor > > > > > > ispell from jed-extra is a drop-in replacement so it is possible this bug > > should be

Bug#451565: jed-extra: no Suggests dependency on ispell

2007-11-17 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-17 09:16]: > To the DJG: I think that it is appropriate to use in jed-extra: > > Suggests: [...], aspell-dictionary | ispell-dictionary > > right? After looking at some docs, it seems that we should not put virtual packages in the first plac

Bug#451565: jed-extra: no Suggests dependency on ispell

2007-11-17 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Alan W. Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-16 15:54]: > Package: jed-extra > Version: 2.4.2-1 > Severity: minor > > > ispell from jed-extra is a drop-in replacement so it is possible this bug > should be filed for jed as well. Anyhow, I wish to point out that neither > jed or jed-extra have a

Bug#451565: jed-extra: no Suggests dependency on ispell

2007-11-16 Thread Alan W. Irwin
Package: jed-extra Version: 2.4.2-1 Severity: minor ispell from jed-extra is a drop-in replacement so it is possible this bug should be filed for jed as well. Anyhow, I wish to point out that neither jed or jed-extra have a Suggests dependency on ispell, and I believe one should be required sinc