* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081104 05:36]:
> This bug isn't assigned to the tech ctte, but I'm going to go ahead and
> weigh in anyway since the thread is still in my mailbox demanding a
> response. :)
>
> Anyway, the release team has now made their decision here, so it would again
> be
This bug isn't assigned to the tech ctte, but I'm going to go ahead and
weigh in anyway since the thread is still in my mailbox demanding a
response. :)
Anyway, the release team has now made their decision here, so it would again
be in order to assign this to the TC if the submitter wishes to appe
# please read it till the end before flame!
# speaking with my TC hat on
severity 449497 important
thanks
* Steffen Joeris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081031 14:31]:
> Dear Technical Committee Members
>
> Currently, there is a dispute about a certain part of the foo2zjs package.
> Unfortunately, we do
Note: I'm not a CTTE member.
Steffen Joeris wrote:
Maintainer:
--
The problem is as follows. The submitter sees the inclusion of the
getweb script as a violation of the DFSG. The script is provided by
upstream to download non-free firmware from his upstream webpage. The
package inc
reassgin 449497 tech-ctte,foo2zjs
thanks
Dear Technical Committee Members
Currently, there is a dispute about a certain part of the foo2zjs package.
Unfortunately, we do not seem to be able to solve it and thus require your
assistance. We have tried to get a paragraph together to state the prob
5 matches
Mail list logo