Bug#448728: mutt: segfaults when launched

2007-11-02 Thread Christoph Berg
severity 448728 normal retitle 448728 'set folder = =' makes mutt segfault tags 448728 = confirmed thanks Re: Sam Morris 2007-11-02 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > It does not. I investigated, and found that it is the following line > in .muttrc that causes the crash: > > set folder = = Thanks for

Bug#448728: mutt: segfaults when launched

2007-11-02 Thread Sam Morris
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 00:56 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > tags 448728 + moreinfo > thanks > > Hi Sam, > > thanks for the report. > > I think we need more context to be able to reproduce that: > > * Does the problem prevail with mutt -F /dev/null? It does not. I investigated, and found that

Bug#448728: mutt: segfaults when launched

2007-11-01 Thread Christoph Berg
tags 448728 + moreinfo thanks Hi Sam, thanks for the report. I think we need more context to be able to reproduce that: * Does the problem prevail with mutt -F /dev/null? * -n? * -f /dev/null? * env -i TERM=$TERM mutt? * Combinations of those? * You seem to use libc6-i686. Does the prob

Bug#448728: mutt: segfaults when launched

2007-10-31 Thread Sam Morris
Package: mutt Version: 1.5.16-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Mutt immediately segfaults when it is run. Starting program: /tmp/mutt-1.5.16/obj-i486-linux-gnu/mutt Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xb7d71513 in strlen () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.