Bug#448639: +1 for /usr/local

2010-09-03 Thread Aigars Mahinovs
On 3 September 2010 16:07, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> Please make the defaults be /usr/local.  At the very least, make the >> Gem binary path be /usr/locall/bin. >> >> Adam > > The comparison (at least for Python, I'm not familiar with the others) isn't > really correct (for Debian/Ubuntu, I don't

Bug#448639: +1 for /usr/local

2010-09-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Saturday, August 28, 2010 02:58:04 pm Adam Jacob wrote: > This has been one of my longest standing issues with Ruby on Debian. > > As a systems administrator, having libraries appear in /var/lib/gems, > and binaries in /var/lib/gems/1.8/bin is incredibly confusing. When I > install a rubygem o

Bug#448639: +1 for /usr/local

2010-08-29 Thread Jeffrey Hulten
For me, when I install any non-debian package (gem, easy_install, or self-compiled) it is a user install. /usr/local makes sense to me. -- Jeffrey Hulten Principal Consultant at Automated Labs, LLC je...@automatedlabs.com 206-923-8246

Bug#448639: +1 for /usr/local

2010-08-28 Thread Darrin Eden
I would like to register my support for RubyGems to be FHS-compliant and install in /usr/local. As a systems administrator I currently spend a significant effort, without adding value, working around Debian's differing RubyGems implementation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ.

Bug#448639: +1 for /usr/local

2010-08-28 Thread Joshua Timberman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I agree with Clint and Adam. While I certainly know how to set my PATH, I still install RubyGems from source on Debian (and Ubuntu) systems because the default package behaves in a way contrary to what I expect. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version

Bug#448639: +1 for /usr/local

2010-08-28 Thread Adam Jacob
On Aug 28, 2010, at 6:26 PM, Daigo Moriwaki wrote: > I have little idea on CPAN or pypi culture. Are unsigned packages (i.e. no > infrastructure checking packages consistency) common on CPAN or pypi? Don't > CPAN > or pypi users have no security concern? They do not have any kind of signing, as

Bug#448639: +1 for /usr/local

2010-08-28 Thread Daigo Moriwaki
Adam, Adam Jacob wrote: > policy, and a smooth and predictable user experience. In this case > we're talking about what happens when an administrator explicitly > decides to take another route - just like when they use CPAN or pypi. I have little idea on CPAN or pypi culture. Are unsigned packag

Bug#448639: 1 for /usr/local

2010-08-28 Thread Ash Berlin
I agree with Adam's points. Primarily it seems very odd to me that `gem` behaves this way when `cpan` does not. -ash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#448639: +1 for /usr/local

2010-08-28 Thread Adam Jacob
This has been one of my longest standing issues with Ruby on Debian. As a systems administrator, having libraries appear in /var/lib/gems, and binaries in /var/lib/gems/1.8/bin is incredibly confusing. When I install a rubygem on a system, I know I'm stepping outside of the bounds of Debian's pur