On 31/08/10 at 09:25 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> On Aug 30, 2010, at 8:55 PM, Daigo Moriwaki wrote:
>
> > Thank you all for the invaluable comments.
> >
> > We, the Debian Ruby packagers, have decided to make a change on this issue.
> >
> > As of Ruby 1.9.2, we are merging the rubygems1.9.1 p
On Aug 30, 2010, at 8:55 PM, Daigo Moriwaki wrote:
> Thank you all for the invaluable comments.
>
> We, the Debian Ruby packagers, have decided to make a change on this issue.
>
> As of Ruby 1.9.2, we are merging the rubygems1.9.1 package into the new
> ruby1.9.1 (1.9.2.0-1) package since the u
Daigo Moriwaki dijo [Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:55:16PM +0900]:
> Thank you all for the invaluable comments.
>
> We, the Debian Ruby packagers, have decided to make a change on this issue.
> (...)
> Anyway, is it correct for me to say that the following locations are our
> consensus?
>
> default_di
Thank you all for the invaluable comments.
We, the Debian Ruby packagers, have decided to make a change on this issue.
As of Ruby 1.9.2, we are merging the rubygems1.9.1 package into the new
ruby1.9.1 (1.9.2.0-1) package since the upstream seems to have integrated
Rubygems with the core more tigh
4 matches
Mail list logo
