* David Schleef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-28 14:21]:
> Here's a patch that is completely untested. If you happen to have a
> gcc with FP enabled, please test it.
Yes, this works. Thanks a lot.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
* David Schleef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-28 14:15]:
> Ah, then you've built a non-fp gcc, but an fp binutils. I hadn't
> thought of that possibility.
Seems so. However, as I said in my last mail, I've no idea how to
build a non-fp binutils. I didn't see an option for that. Can you
help?
--
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:17:56PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Are you sure about that? I believe I've built my toolchain correctly
> for powerpc soft-float, but binutils doesn't complain at all about
> this code. As a result, liboil builds for FPU but then later on GCC
> fails to compile so
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:17:56PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > From: David Schleef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > even if there isn't. The binary will only fail at run time, i.e. when
> > > you actually execute it. This check therefore needs to be converted
> > > to a runtime check.
> >
> >
> From: David Schleef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > even if there isn't. The binary will only fail at run time, i.e. when
> > you actually execute it. This check therefore needs to be converted
> > to a runtime check.
>
> This is correct. It's a test whether or not binutils can compile
> floating po
Package: liboil
Version: 0.3.12-1
liboil tests for a powerpc FPU by compiling a test program with a
floating point instruction in it. This doesn't seem to work.
Aurelien Jarno confirmed this:
14:09 the __asm__ directive passes the code directly to binutils
14:09 so the binary has the fadd inst
6 matches
Mail list logo
