No, libpurple0 is not installed. What should I do first, install that or
unmarkauto pidgin? (Personally, I don't care but I'd like to isolate the
bug...)
Regards,
André
Ari Pollak wrote:
> Er, did libpurple0 already get installed? What happens if you run
> aptitude unmarkauto pidgin?
>
> On Wed,
Er, did libpurple0 already get installed? What happens if you run
aptitude unmarkauto pidgin?
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 09:34 +0200, Andre Wendt wrote:
> Package: pidgin
> Version: 2.2.0-1
> Severity: important
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I can't upgrade pidgin from versi
Package: pidgin
Version: 2.2.0-1
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I can't upgrade pidgin from version 2.0.1-1 to 2.2.0-1, it would get
removed in the process:
$ LANG=C apt-cache policy pidgin pidgin-data
pidgin:
Installed: 2.0.1-1
Candidate: 2.2.0-1
Version
3 matches
Mail list logo