On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 22:55 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > > but you're the package maintainer, i'm just a stupid user, who
> is
> > > trying
> > > > to propose some usability improvements ...
> > >
> > > I need to pick a balance here. Is forcing every user to install
> the
> > > extra package
> > > but you're the package maintainer, i'm just a stupid user, who is
> > trying
> > > to propose some usability improvements ...
> >
> > I need to pick a balance here. Is forcing every user to install the
> > extra package before use (and removing the plugins for default
> > install) the right
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 08:21 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> > but you're the package maintainer, i'm just a stupid user, who is
> trying
> > to propose some usability improvements ...
>
> I need to pick a balance here. Is forcing every user to install the
> extra package before use (and removing
At Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:20:28 +0200,
Tim Blechmann wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> > Because they have different names and IDs, it's not a wise idea to
> > remove them from Debian.
>
> i am not proposing to _remove_ the plugins, but to split the package ...
Effectively the same thing.
> > Splitting a package
> Because they have different names and IDs, it's not a wise idea to
> remove them from Debian.
i am not proposing to _remove_ the plugins, but to split the package ...
as for the different names ... isn't it confusing to have a "High Pass
Filter (One Pole)" and a "Simple High Pass Filter", especi
Hi,
> > > according to /usr/share/doc/ladspa-sdk/example_plugins.html, plugins
> > > with the same functionality are also included in the cmt plugin
> > > set. thus i would propose to split this package in to two
> > > packages. one for providing the sdk and one for providing the demo
> > > plugin
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 17:58 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> >
> > according to /usr/share/doc/ladspa-sdk/example_plugins.html, plugins
> > with the same functionality are also included in the cmt plugin
> > set. thus i would propose to split this package in to two
> > packages. one for providing th
>
> according to /usr/share/doc/ladspa-sdk/example_plugins.html, plugins
> with the same functionality are also included in the cmt plugin
> set. thus i would propose to split this package in to two
> packages. one for providing the sdk and one for providing the demo
> plugins. thus it can be avoi
Package: ladspa-sdk
Version: 1.1-6
Severity: wishlist
the ladspa sdk provides some demo plugins:
/usr/lib/ladspa/amp.so
/usr/lib/ladspa/delay.so
/usr/lib/ladspa/filter.so
/usr/lib/ladspa/noise.so
/usr/lib/ladspa/sine.so
according to /usr/share/doc/ladspa-sdk/example_plugins.html, plugins with the
9 matches
Mail list logo
