Package: openntpd
Followup-For: Bug #436995
Is this still a thing?
How can we reproduce this bug to see if it is still an issue?
tags 436995 confirmed
thanks
On 08/03/12 16:03, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> reopen 436995
> thanks
>
>> fixed on experimental
> Which version? Looking at the sources of upstream 4.6, there's no sign
> of it being fixed.
>
> -- Juliusz
My bad, I mixed two different bug reports on a separated issue
reopen 436995
thanks
> fixed on experimental
Which version? Looking at the sources of upstream 4.6, there's no sign
of it being fixed.
-- Juliusz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
> Can you check if this problem still exists at newer packages?
> If you could test it at version 3.9p1+debian-3 would be great.
At a quick glance, nothing has changed in the source code as far as this
issue is concerned. Please see the function server_dispatch in
server.c.
> If it does, can you
On -10/01/37 16:59, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Package: openntpd
> Version: 3.9p1-4
> Severity: important
>
> When acting as a server, OpenNTP sends replies with incorrect root
> delay and dispersion values. Since both of these values are smaller
> then they should be, this has the potential of c
Package: openntpd
Version: 3.9p1-4
Severity: important
When acting as a server, OpenNTP sends replies with incorrect root
delay and dispersion values. Since both of these values are smaller
then they should be, this has the potential of confusing legit NTP
clients, and might potentially cause syn
6 matches
Mail list logo
