Hi, Rogério,
>>> A good start would be to ask them to have their CVS/Subversion/whatever
>>> repository "revealed" and not just snapshots of their software when they
>>> release a new point release of MacOS X.
>> Ok. Can you also send a link to Apple's snapshots so I can put the
>> request into c
Rogério Brito wrote:
> Now, you've got me. They seem to ask for a registration and I have no clue
> on how it works.
> I wish that they were as open as Debian regarding their
> Bug Tracking System.
Me too. I largely gave up on them last autumn - lack of openness in the
bug tracker, failure to
Hi, Lars.
On May 28 2008, Lars Noodén wrote:
> Rogério Brito wrote:
>
> > A good start would be to ask them to have their CVS/Subversion/whatever
> > repository "revealed" and not just snapshots of their software when they
> > release a new point release of MacOS X.
>
> Ok. Can you also send a
Rogério Brito wrote:
> On May 28 2008, Lars Noodén wrote:
>> Rogério Brito wrote:
>>> P.S.: Lars, would it be possible for you to ask the Ubuntu people to
>>> collaborate a bit more? They seem to still have dangerous versions of the
>>> package installed on their repository. At least revision -4 is
Rogério Brito wrote:
> A good start would be to ask them to have their CVS/Subversion/whatever
> repository "revealed" and not just snapshots of their software when they
> release a new point release of MacOS X.
Ok. Can you also send a link to Apple's snapshots so I can put the
request into cont
On May 28 2008, Lars Noodén wrote:
> Rogério Brito wrote:
> > P.S.: Lars, would it be possible for you to ask the Ubuntu people to
> > collaborate a bit more? They seem to still have dangerous versions of the
> > package installed on their repository. At least revision -4 is needed for
> > the pack
Rogério Brito wrote:
> P.S.: Lars, would it be possible for you to ask the Ubuntu people to
> collaborate a bit more? They seem to still have dangerous versions of the
> package installed on their repository. At least revision -4 is needed for
> the package to work correctly on amd64.
Sure. Can y
Dear people,
It seems that finally Apple has admitted that their code is not 64-bit
clean (please, see the mail attached to this message).
The nice thing is that they seem to be open about receiving/integrating
patches on their build system. This will alleviate my work (and the work of
those that
Dear sirs,
On Sep 28 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please include the line below in follow-up emails for this request.
>
> Follow-up: 31431748
>
> Hello Prof. Rogério Brito,
>
> Our engineers have evaluated this issue and determine that the value
> at -1 offset of srcOffs is a valid value i
Dear Darwin Develpers,
I am a Debian user and prospective Debian Developer that has packaged
the disk utilities of Darwin for Debian and I noticed a pretty
serious problem when compiling the fsck_hfs utility under many 64 bit
platforms.
The bug manifests itself as a segmentation fault whe
10 matches
Mail list logo
