Bug#435539: util-vserver: vserver-stat doesn't report ANY running vservers...

2007-08-03 Thread Jan H Eringa
Ummm ... yeah 2.6.21-2-vserver-sparc64 I'm really sorry if I didn't mention that before. Both of the bugs I logged seem to be related to the 2.6.21 kernel Cheers Jan. --- Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > Ok, do that mean that I can assume that this is a problem in 2.6.

Bug#435539: util-vserver: vserver-stat doesn't report ANY running vservers...

2007-08-03 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Ok, do that mean that I can assume that this is a problem in 2.6.20 kernel? Regards, // Ola On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 10:33:53AM +0100, Jan H Eringa wrote: > Hiya guys, > > I've just run vserver-stat on the machine under the 2.6.18 vserver kernel > vserver-stat > CTX PROCVSZRSS use

Bug#435539: util-vserver: vserver-stat doesn't report ANY running vservers...

2007-08-01 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Jan On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 01:48:17PM +0100, Jan H Eringa wrote: > Package: util-vserver > Version: 0.30.213-1 > Severity: important > > -snip- > my-server# vserver-stat > CTX PROCVSZRSS userTIME sysTIMEUPTIME NAME > my-server# > -snip- > Even

Bug#435539: util-vserver: vserver-stat doesn't report ANY running vservers...

2007-08-01 Thread Micah Anderson
* Jan H Eringa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070801 06:19]: > Package: util-vserver > Version: 0.30.213-1 > Severity: important > > -snip- > my-server# vserver-stat > CTX PROCVSZRSS userTIME sysTIMEUPTIME NAME > my-server# > -snip- > Even though two vserver

Bug#435539: util-vserver: vserver-stat doesn't report ANY running vservers...

2007-08-01 Thread Jan H Eringa
Package: util-vserver Version: 0.30.213-1 Severity: important -snip- my-server# vserver-stat CTX PROCVSZRSS userTIME sysTIMEUPTIME NAME my-server# -snip- Even though two vservers are running. my-server# ls -al /proc/virtual/ total 0 dr-xr-xr-x 4