Bug#434418: new version

2007-08-09 Thread Michael Meskes
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 05:57:18PM +0200, Joost Yervante Damad wrote: > In my opinion the problem still persists. All you did is change it from > awaking a lot to awaking a little less (2x a second). My preferred solution > would only wake up when needed. Are you absolutely positive that blocking

Bug#434418: new version

2007-08-09 Thread Bruce Duncan
On Thursday 09 August 2007 16:57:18 Joost Yervante Damad wrote: > In my opinion the problem still persists. All you did is change it from > awaking a lot to awaking a little less (2x a second). My preferred solution > would only wake up when needed. Are you absolutely positive that blocking > infin

Bug#434418: new version

2007-08-09 Thread Joost Yervante Damad
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 15:04:38 Michael Meskes wrote: > I just uploaded a new version to incoming that also contains changes to > the code fragment patched in this bug report. Albeit this patch is > different than the one listed here. Could you please try whether the > problem still exists wit

Bug#434418: new version

2007-08-08 Thread Michael Meskes
I just uploaded a new version to incoming that also contains changes to the code fragment patched in this bug report. Albeit this patch is different than the one listed here. Could you please try whether the problem still exists with -8? Thanks. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Me