On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 05:38:49AM -0700, Jeff Lanzarotta wrote:
> Argh! I thought this was fixed...
> Please give this new version a try. Let me know what happens...
Hi Jeff, thanks for your fixed version of bufexplorer.
I was going to add it do our vim-scripts Debian package, but I notice it
is
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 05:38:49AM -0700, Jeff Lanzarotta wrote:
> Hello James,
>
> Argh! I thought this was fixed...
>
> Please give this new version a try. Let me know what happens...
Yes, that version works fine. Thanks for the update.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
Hello James,
Argh! I thought this was fixed...
Please give this new version a try. Let me know what happens...
Thanks,
Jeff
James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeff,
As demonstrated below, the current version of bufexplorer is using :drop
without a check to see if the running Vim has +gui.
tags 433800 - moreinfo
thanks
SZ> quoting from ":help drop":
SZ> {only available when compiled with the +gui feature}
SZ> So I guess you're running a flavour of vim which has no gui built-in.
SZ> Try installing one of vim-{gnome,gtk,lesstif,perl,python,ruby,full,tcl},
SZ> basically any flavour w
Jeff,
As demonstrated below, the current version of bufexplorer is using :drop
without a check to see if the running Vim has +gui. This is happening
at line 239. StartBufExplorer is called with 'drop' as its argument and
then that argument is used in the call to SplitOpen.
James
On 7/19/07, D
Package: vim-scripts
Version: 7.1.2
Severity: important
dwork:[/home/dimka]$ rm -fr ~/.vim
dwork:[/home/dimka]$ vim-addons list|grep ^bufex
bufexplorer
dwork:[/home/dimka]$ vim-addons install bufexplorer
Info: installing removed addon 'bufexplorer'
Info: Rebuilding tags since do
6 matches
Mail list logo
