> > So, you're proposing the following workflow is better
> >
> > git-add XXX
> > git-add YYY
> > git-status (check what's going to be committed)
> > git-diff --cached (check the actual diff to be committed)
> > debcommit
> >
> > rather than
> >
> > git-status (check what
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> At Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:39:21 +0100,
> Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> You're receiving this e-mail as you've recently (for relative values of
>> "recently" :-) submitted a request to modify the way that debcommit
>> handles git repositories.
>>
>> I'm not a git user myself as yet,
2 matches
Mail list logo
