Bug#432893: Processed: severity of 432893 is important

2007-09-12 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > I don't see why I should not change the severity of a report against a > package I'm not maintaining if the severity looks incorrect and the > maintainance team didn't state anything about the severity. If you were > basing that on something, plea

Bug#432893: Processed: severity of 432893 is important

2007-09-11 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Le lundi 10 septembre 2007 07:19, Guillem Jover a écrit : > On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 21:22:00 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > severity 432893 important > > thanks > > > > Le mercredi 29 août 2007 12:51, Kurt Roeckx a écrit : > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:12:10AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: >

Bug#432893: Processed: severity of 432893 is important

2007-09-10 Thread Guillem Jover
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 21:22:00 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > severity 432893 important > thanks > > Le mercredi 29 août 2007 12:51, Kurt Roeckx a écrit : > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:12:10AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > > Hi Kurt, > > > I don't necessarily think that this bug is not RC,

Bug#432893: Processed: severity of 432893 is important

2007-08-30 Thread Kurt Roeckx
severity 432893 serious thanks On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:22:00PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > OK. Nevertheless, I'm not convinced that this bug is release-critical, so I'm > downgrading to important again. Do not upgrade the severity to serious again, > as this bug is not a policy violation

Bug#432893: Processed: severity of 432893 is important

2007-08-29 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:12:10AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > Hi Kurt, > I don't necessarily think that this bug is not RC, I just assumed it wasn't. > Severity was set to serious indirectly by the cloned bug's severity. While > the severity against ghc seemed fine, I think it's unlikely

Bug#432893: Processed: severity of 432893 is important

2007-08-29 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Le mercredi 29 août 2007 03:28, Kurt Roeckx a écrit : > severity 432893 serious > thanks > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 02:42:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > > > sev

Bug#432893: Processed: severity of 432893 is important

2007-08-29 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > For the record, Philippe Cloutier alias Filipus Klutiero (and > chealer on IRC) was already banned from the BTS control interface. I > don't know if his ban has been lifted or if he uses another email. > CCings BTS admins for info. I removed the ban a

Bug#432893: Processed: severity of 432893 is important

2007-08-29 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > severity 432893 serious > thanks > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 02:42:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > > > severity 43

Bug#432893: Processed: severity of 432893 is important

2007-08-29 Thread Kurt Roeckx
severity 432893 serious thanks On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 02:42:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > > severity 432893 important > Bug#432893: dpkg: Failed install follow